28.02.14, 23:56:36
55555
Zitat aus einem Schreiben der BRD an den CRPD-Ausschuß bezüglich dessen Auslegung von Art 12 CRPD:
Zitat:
Germany remains convinced that there are situations in which persons with disabilities simply are not able to make decisions even with the best support available. Therefore, while representing a shift in focus from substitute decision-making to supported decision-making, the Convention could not and in Germany’s view does not rule out the possibility of substitute decision-making in some cases. Most State Parties acknowledge in their legal systems the right of parents or legal guardians to represent children without distinction as to the existence of a disability. Where adults are in need of support, such support may be given by ordering legal representation or guardianship, also without distinction regarding the existence of a disability. All forms of representation or guardianship exist for the benefit of the supported person and may only be used according to the will and preferences or the best interests of the person s concerned. For that reason, Germany does not find it appropriate to label national legislation designed for the protection of such persons as “discriminatory”.
Quelle
Ich staune, ist das einfältig, zynisch, arrogant? Von allem ein bischen? Einerseits nicht wirklich argumentieren, andererseits allgemein bekannte Probleme einfach pauschal leugnen.